data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95fee/95fee899143365073599140da9185d66831a4ee8" alt=""
Some of them have to deal with handling abort conditions during a property evaluation. In any practical protocol used to transfer data across, typical transfers occur over several clock cycles. There are situations where-in an abort condition triggers and ongoing evaluations needs to be aborted/terminated. IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog provides disable iff construct to model this. A sample code:
Now consider the case that the aborting condition is not a simple signal, rather a temporal sequence. One might think of adding a sequence inside disable iff but that's illegal as per LRM. You typically get errors like:
// Tool errors out
// See: http://www.verificationguild.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=2889
Sequence or property instance used in a non-temporal context
//
So how do you model an abort sequence then? Consider a temporal behavior being verified as shown below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c79d/4c79d2df48639e64ea1643b9aa28e094c3c0e7e7" alt=""
Now consider an abort sequence as in:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7ec0/c7ec0c9f2f9d95ee25424b22a7f9ff04c3485540" alt=""
So how do you model this? SystemVerilog allows sequence.triggered inside disable iff. So you can do:
a_p_mstr_xfer : assert property (disable iff (mstr_abort_seq.triggered) p_mstr_xfer);
Enjoy SystemVerilog!
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
No comments:
Post a Comment